Trump's Military Agenda Hides Donor-Benefiting Divide-and-Conquer Tactic

The recent surge in live artillery fire exercises near Camp Pendleton on October 18, 2025, raises disturbing questions about the Trump administration's true intentions behind these military operations. The coincidental timing of these events with the No Kings protests across the nation, which were organized in response to Trump's increasingly authoritarian policies and rhetoric, cannot be overlooked.

Notably, a close examination of the key Republicans involved in propagating the "Hate America" narrative reveals connections to various military contractors. For instance, Mike Johnson, Tom Emmer, and Sean Duffy have all received significant campaign contributions from defense industry giants such as Lockheed Martin and Raytheon Technologies. These companies stand to benefit greatly from increased military presence in California and other key regions.

While the Trump administration's coordinated efforts to discredit and distract from its own authoritarian policies through fear-mongering narratives might seem like a clever tactic, it is actually a classic case of divide-and-conquer strategy being employed by powerful individuals. By creating a sense of national urgency around internal domestic issues, they are able to justify increased military presence in key regions while simultaneously eroding public trust and opposition.

Further investigation reveals that Republican donors see significant value in perpetuating fear-mongering narratives to sway public opinion in their favor. A synchronized campaign is being waged by connected insiders to create a false narrative of creeping fascism among the US public, thereby justifying increased military presence under the guise of national security. This orchestrated strategy benefits not only the Trump administration but also its loyal donors.

The most damning evidence lies in the actions of key players involved. The deliberate choice of October 18, 2025, as a date for both the No Kings protests and the live artillery fire exercise suggests a premeditated attempt to create a spectacle that would distract from actual policy concerns while justifying increased military presence. As we move forward, it is crucial to remain vigilant and question the motivations behind these events. The future implications of this conspiracy are far-reaching and potentially catastrophic if left unchecked.